Washington post dating column
Stop taking lovers and get married," with the subhead, "The data show that #yesallwomen would be safer hitched to their baby daddies," the piece soon became, "One way to end violence against women?Married dads," with the subhead, "The data show that #yesallwomen would be safer with fewer boyfriends around their kids." Shockingly, people stayed pretty mad about the whole thing. Rather than present the social science with the heavy dose of qualifiers, context and skepticism deployed by the the actual researchers who produced it and the experts who have grappled with it, writers W.The official White House newsletter on Friday included a link encouraging readers to check out an article titled 'Trump’s budget makes perfect sense and will fix America, and I will tell you why,' apparently not realizing it was a piece of satire.'This budget will make America a lean, mean fighting machine with bulging, rippling muscles and not an ounce of fat,' Washington Post opinion writer Alexandra Petri penned in her Thursday column.'All schoolchildren will be taught by an F-35 wearing a Make America Great Again hat,' she continued.
They will probably say that they are just presenting social science and data as it stands and not trying to turn it into a behavioral proscription, despite the fact that the piece is exactly that.
Probably the best thing about the latest piece of garbage that the Washington Post opinion section has given the Internet is that an editor seriously thought that he (or she) could save the thing by changing its headline and subhead.
So while it was first announced as, "One way to end violence against women?
Petri, clearly no fan of President Donald Trump's budget proposal, went on to jokingly justify budget cuts to the State Department ('Only HARD POWER now'), Environmental Protection Agency ('Clean rivers and breathable air are making us SOFT') and the Department of Agriculture ('We will be HUNTERS again'), among others.'I was as surprised as anyone to discover that I was Real News,' Petri wrote in a follow-up piece after seeing her humor column described as a 'News Report' by the White House.'Here I thought that I was toiling away in the Dank Cesspool of the Mainstream Media, but all along I was a Trusted News Source, just like Breitbart.com!
' she continued, referring to the right-wing news and opinion site known to be a Trump favorite.'I honestly thought that, no matter the headline, there was no way that anyone could think this piece was anything other than [satire],' wrote Petri.
Kurtz also wrote of Pari Bradlee, "From one perspective, Pari Bradlee's provocative poses might be viewed as a quick way to grab attention, especially in contrast to Washington's buttoned-down culture.